Welcome to a Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green e-Advisory.

 YOU
 THINK
 
BIG
 
THOUGHTS.
 
WE HELP MAKE THEM HAPPEN.

Copyright
Copyright

Trademark
Trademark

Trade Secret
Trade Secret

Patent Litigation
Patent Litigation

License/
Assignment

License/Assignment

Internet/
E-commerce

Internet/E-commerce

Litigation
Litigation

Who's Minding the Farm?
Keeping an Eye on Your Valuable Marks

by Douglas G. Verge


As a trademark owner, the value in your brand lies in its ability to uniquely identify your business as the source of products or services sold under your marks. It goes almost without saying that it is important that others do not use the same or similar marks for similar products or services. If they do, the significance of your brand can be diminished and, in the worst case scenario, confusion might result, causing you to lose income, and eventually even your exclusive rights in the marks. Accordingly, it is a good idea to be on the lookout for other marks that might infringe upon your brands. There are various ways, in varying levels of detail, to accomplish this purpose.

One relatively inexpensive, albeit not very thorough, method is to conduct routine Internet searches using your mark and variants thereof. This method is not very directed and can result in a lot of unwanted hits, although search engines such as GoogleTM offer very wide coverage. Nevertheless, such searches might not pick up similar marks, focusing instead on marks that fit the literal search terms supplied by you. A significant limitation of this approach is the inability to focus on design marks. 

As an adjunct to this common law search, a routine search of the United States Patent and Trademark Office's online trademark database can be helpful to turn up new applications. Such a search must be done on at least a weekly basis to be useful. Again, though, this type of monitoring search will only pick up terms essentially identical to those entered in the search, so it is possible that similar marks will be missed if all possible variants are not searched. Also, it would be virtually impossible to monitor design marks. 

Yet another approach would be to have someone designated to review the Official Gazette on a regular basis. This publication is the official U.S. Patent and Trademark Office publication containing marks published for opposition. The virtue of reviewing the Official Gazette is that it enables you to view all published marks that may be similar, and to see what the goods or services are that are connected to those marks. On the other hand, the Gazette will not pick up state law applications or common law uses. It only covers applications  that actually reach the publication stage and are not already registered or past the publication stage. However, once you have applied for registration of a trademark, presumably you have had a thorough search undertaken of your mark up to that point. At a minimum, you will know where you stand as far as marks in the USPTO are concerned because you will receive feedback from that office if the Examining Attorney thinks there are any problematic marks. Once your mark is registered, however, the only feedback you will receive will be based upon your own efforts, unless a third party contacts you.

Reading the Official Gazette can be time consuming and cumbersome, especially if you have several marks. For a relatively small amount of money (under $200 per mark per year for word marks and in the range of $300 per year for design marks), outside services such as Thomson & Thomson will review the Official Gazette for you or, alternatively, will keep track of newly filed applications (or both if you want to pay for both). Comprehensive watch services that include the USPTO, state registries, common law sources and domain names can be obtained for a cost between $800 to $1,000 per mark per year. Services such as Thomson & Thomson will conduct worldwide watch services as well. Prices for these services range from under $300 per mark per year for identical or phonetically equivalent word watches in all classes and for confusingly similar marks in one class or for identical or closely similar designs in one class. The U.S. and worldwide watches may be offered as a package as well. 

Obviously, money is a factor. You might decide that you only want to focus on your key brands. Or, you might prefer to do a comprehensive watch for your key brand(s) and utilize one or more other watch techniques for your minor brands. You might also choose to do a combination of watch methods for maximum coverage. Either way, monitoring marks is a significant step you can take to keep your brand vital in the marketplace. Don't forget the old adage - "you snooze, you lose."  (December 2003)

[Contact Author]

Advisory Subscription

If you did not receive a copy of this Advisory directly and would like to receive it in the future, please click on the add icon and include your e-mail address. If you would like to unsubscribe from future Advisories, please click on the remove icon and include your e-mail address:
Email:  
     Add     Remove     

This Advisory, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA.

SHEEHAN PHINNEY BASS + GREEN, PA
A regional law firm.
 

CONCORD
143 North Main Street
Concord, NH 03301
603 223.2020

MANCHESTER
1000 Elm Street
Manchester, NH 03101
603 668.0300

BOSTON
260 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110
617 897.5600

www.sheehan.com
 

 Copyright © 2003 Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA. All rights reserved.                                                               Contact Us

This email was sent to you by Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA
P.O. Box 3701, 1000 Elm Street, Manchester, NH 03105-3701

(Remove) - to be excluded from this list and/or future mailings