Welcome to the Intellectual Property e-Advisory, a Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green e-newsletter!

 YOU
 THINK
 
BIG
 
THOUGHTS.
 
WE HELP MAKE THEM HAPPEN.

Copyright
Copyright

Trademark
Trademark

Trade Secret
Trade Secret

Patent Litigation
Patent Litigation

License/
Assignment

License/Assignment

Internet/
E-commerce

Internet/E-commerce

Litigation
Litigation

Is There A European Trademark On Your Horizon?
If So, Now Is The Time To File

by Douglas G. Verge


Thinking about European trademark protection?  If so, file now in order to take advantage of the changes that will be occurring with respect to the composition of the European Union (EU). At present, the EU consists of 15 countries: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom. As of May 1, 2004, ten more countries will become members of the EU, namely: Estonia, Poland, Hungary, Cyprus, Latvia, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Lithuania, Slovak Republic, Malta. Unlike other trademark protocols or systems, the European Union has a mechanism for filing one trademark application that covers all 15 (soon to be 25) countries. This mechanism is known as a Community Trademark (CTM). A CTM application is filed with the Office for Harmonization in the International Market (OHIM), located in Alicante, Spain. The advantage of this type of application is that, if registration issues, it will cover all of the EU countries. A potential downside, however, is that if there is opposition in any of the EU countries, it can prevent the CTM from maturing into registration. Even in such case, though, it still may be possible to convert to national applications in countries where there is no opposition, and retain the CTM filing date.

If you plan to sell or license goods or services in foreign countries it is always a good idea to file for protection abroad, whether in Europe or elsewhere, as soon as is economically feasible. It is not uncommon for a person or entity in a foreign country to become aware of a mark used in the U.S. and to file for trademark protection in one or more countries, including a CTM application, in order to secure the rights to the mark in those countries. Because a party has a substantial period of time overseas to put a mark into use (sometimes as many as five years), the holder of the U.S. trademark will not be able to challenge the foreign registration on the grounds that the mark is not being used until the grace period has expired. The result in such case often is that the U.S. owner (1) cannot use its valuable mark(s) in certain countries where it plans to do business, or, (2) must enter into an economic arrangement with the foreign owner that permits the U.S. owner to use its marks in the countries in issue.

Why is it useful to file for a CTM before May 1, 2004?  The key reason is that filing for a CTM prior to that date will prevent the CTM application from being challenged on certain grounds as a result of the nine new languages that will be added to the EU. The EU now has eleven official languages. The new members will add nine new national languages to this group. Each national language must be taken into account when examining marks for matters such as descriptiveness or deceptiveness. Hence, if a mark is descriptive in one of the languages of the EU, it likely will be refused CTM registration. Applying before May 1, 2004 will avoid this result as to the new member countries, although there are certain qualifications. First, if a mark is descriptive in a new member country, a pre-May 1 applicant can use it in that country, but cannot stop any other person from using the descriptive term in that country. Second, if the mark is deceptive in the language of one of the new member countries, the applicant cannot use the mark in that country.

Another benefit of filing for a CTM before May 1, 2004 is that even though the owner of a trademark in one of the new member countries has the right to oppose a CTM application that is filed between November 1, 2003 and May 1, 2004 on the basis of a prior national right, if the owner does not exercise that right, it will not be entitled to later seek cancellation of the CTM registration. Of course, CTM applications filed after May 1, 2004 are subject to opposition or cancellation by trademark owners in the new member countries.

[Contact Author]

Advisory Subscription

If you did not receive a copy of this Advisory directly and would like to receive it in the future, please click on the add icon and include your e-mail address. If you would like to unsubscribe from future Advisories, please click on the remove icon and include your e-mail address:
Email:  
     Add     Remove     

This Advisory, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute the rendering of legal advice or other professional advice by Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA.

SHEEHAN PHINNEY BASS + GREEN, PA
A Regional Business Law Firm.
Innovative Approaches. Practical Solutions.
 

CONCORD
143 North Main Street
Concord, NH 03301
603 223.2020

MANCHESTER
1000 Elm Street
Manchester, NH 03101
603 668.0300

BOSTON
260 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110
617 897.5600

www.sheehan.com
 

 Copyright © 2004 Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA. All rights reserved.                                                               Contact Us

This email was sent to you by Sheehan Phinney Bass + Green, PA
P.O. Box 3701, 1000 Elm Street, Manchester, NH 03105-3701

(Remove) - to be excluded from this list and/or future mailings